Failure cases, free help and official sources
EMI cheque or NACH bounce: Section 138 notice, the 15-day window and how to respond
How a bounced EMI or security cheque becomes a Section 138 case in India, the notice and complaint timelines, penalties, interim compensation, NACH failures and settlement options.
If a cheque you gave a lender bounces for insufficient funds, the lender can send you a written demand notice within 30 days of learning of the dishonour. This includes post-dated EMI cheques and security cheques. You then have 15 days from receiving the notice to pay the cheque amount. If you do not pay, the lender can file a criminal complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 within one month. The court can impose imprisonment of up to two years, a fine of up to twice the cheque amount, or both. The court can also order interim compensation of up to 20% of the cheque amount during the case. A failed NACH or ECS mandate can lead to a similar complaint under Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007. The 15-day window is the most important deadline. Paying, or agreeing a written settlement, within it stops the offence arising.
This guide is part of debt settlement mistakes. It is general information, not legal advice.
The Section 138 timeline
| Step | Time limit | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Cheque presented | Within its validity period, usually 3 months from its date | Post-dated cheques are valid from the date written on them |
| Cheque returned unpaid | – | "Funds insufficient" or "exceeds arrangement"; courts have also treated "payment stopped" and "account closed" as covered in many cases |
| Lender sends written notice | Within 30 days of receiving information of the dishonour | By post, courier or other modes courts accept |
| You pay the cheque amount | Within 15 days of receiving the notice | Paying here means no offence is made out |
| Complaint filed | Within one month after the 15 days end | Courts can condone delay for sufficient cause |
| Trial | Usually summary trial before a magistrate | Takes months to years |
What the law requires
For a Section 138 offence, broadly:
- The cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt or liability.
- It was presented within its validity.
- It bounced for insufficient funds or because it exceeded the arrangement.
- A written notice was sent in time.
- The amount was not paid within 15 days of receipt.
Security cheques. Courts have held that a cheque given as security can still attract Section 138 if the debt was legally due when it was presented. Whether a particular cheque qualifies depends on the facts. Take advice rather than assuming "it was only security".
Section 139 presumption. The court presumes the cheque was for a debt, unless you prove otherwise. Simply denying the debt is not enough.
Penalties and orders the court can make
| Provision | What it allows |
|---|---|
| Section 138 | Imprisonment up to 2 years, fine up to twice the cheque amount, or both |
| Section 143A | Interim compensation of up to 20% of the cheque amount, payable during trial |
| Section 148 | On appeal against conviction, the appellate court can order a deposit of at least 20% of the fine or compensation |
| Section 147 | The offence is compoundable: it can be settled between the parties, with the court's permission |
Courts have issued guidelines on when compounding is allowed and on the costs payable at different stages of a case. Settling early is generally cheaper. Ask your lawyer about the current guidelines.
NACH, ECS and auto-debit failures
Most EMIs are now collected by NACH mandate. If a mandate debit fails for insufficient funds, the lender can charge a bounce charge as disclosed in your key fact statement. A failed electronic transfer can also lead to a complaint under Section 25 of the Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007, which follows a notice-and-payment structure similar to Section 138. Lenders more often pursue civil recovery for NACH failures, but do not rely on that.
Worked example (illustrative)
- EMI cheque of ₹14,500 bounces on 5 August
- Bank charges: ₹500 + 18% GST = ₹590 bounce charge on your account, plus the lender's own bounce fee
- Lender's notice received on 25 August
- 15-day window ends on 9 September
If you pay ₹14,500 to the lender by 9 September, no Section 138 offence arises for that cheque. Keep the receipt and a copy of the notice. The overdue EMI, penal charges and credit report entry still follow under the loan terms.
If you cannot pay the full ₹14,500, write to the lender before 9 September. Offer what you can, ask for restructuring, and request that it not present further cheques. A written agreement protects you better than a promise on the phone.
If you have several post-dated cheques with a lender
- Ask the lender to return unused cheques and switch to a NACH mandate you can manage, or to a revised schedule.
- Do not issue new cheques you know will bounce.
- Keep enough in the account before each presentation date, or talk to the lender before it.
- On settlement, make sure the letter says that all cheques will be returned or cancelled and no complaint will be filed. See the settlement letter checklist.
If a complaint has already been filed
- Do not ignore the summons. If you do not appear, a warrant can be issued.
- Get a lawyer, or free legal aid if you qualify. See free legal aid.
- Consider settlement or compounding. Many cheque cases are settled, including through Lok Adalats. See DRT and Lok Adalat.
- Raise valid defences, such as no debt due, cheque misused, notice defective or complaint out of time, with your lawyer.
Related guides
When to consult a professional
As soon as you receive a Section 138 notice, and certainly before the 15 days end. The notice decides whether a criminal case can be filed.
Frequently asked questions
Can I stop payment on a cheque to avoid a case?
Stopping payment does not automatically avoid Section 138. Courts have treated stop-payment cases as covered where funds were insufficient or the debt was due. Talk to the lender instead.
Does paying after 15 days end the case?
Not automatically, but a settlement can lead to compounding with the court's permission. Earlier is cheaper.
Is a missed EMI without a cheque a criminal offence?
No. A missed EMI on its own is a civil matter. Criminal liability arises from specific acts, such as a cheque bounce left unpaid after notice, or fraud.
Can the lender file cases for each bounced cheque?
Each dishonoured cheque can give rise to a separate complaint. Settle all of them together in writing.
Sources
- India Code: Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 and Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007
- Reserve Bank of India: cheque validity and NACH rules
- National Legal Services Authority: free legal aid and Lok Adalats